<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THE MOVIE ANARCHIST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://movieanarchist.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://movieanarchist.com</link>
	<description>Reviews and Rants by Anon E. Muss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='movieanarchist.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://movieanarchist.com/osd.xml" title="THE MOVIE ANARCHIST" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://movieanarchist.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>My Rating System</title>
		<link>http://movieanarchist.com/2011/01/01/my-rating-system/</link>
		<comments>http://movieanarchist.com/2011/01/01/my-rating-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Muss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rating System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movieanarchist.wordpress.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s important to understand the way I rate movies.  Some people give 4 stars or 5, or rate on a scale of 1 to 10 as on the IMDb.  I use the IMDb system with a minor twist.  I have always rated movies from 1 to 1o, but because I believe a 10 is perfection [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=movieanarchist.com&#038;blog=18772183&#038;post=1&#038;subd=movieanarchist&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to understand the way I rate movies.  Some people give 4 stars or 5, or rate on a scale of 1 to 10 as on the IMDb.  I use the IMDb system with a minor twist.  I have always rated movies from 1 to 1o, but because I believe a 10 is perfection I have only rated seven movies with that score.  This causes some confusion.  Since the overwhelming majority of films have no chance of receiving a 10 I shouldn&#8217;t rate them as if they can.  With my old system a 6 out of 10 (6/10) is actually pretty high since it&#8217;s really a 6 out of 9 (6/9).</p>
<p>My resolution for the new year is to end this confusion (which I&#8217;m sure exists only in my mind).  Beginning today, my ratings (see Twitter @MovieAnarchist) will be on a scale of 1 to 9.**  The extremely rare film that I feel deserves a 10 will simply be rated as a 10.  I have already revealed two of them, so I don&#8217;t intend to mention another in this post.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;re reading this I&#8217;m sure you think I&#8217;m fucking nuts for taking the time to write about such a seemingly inconsequential point.  Movies are my passion so I feel the need to be clear with the manner in which I rate them.   Of course movie ratings are subjective and the difference between giving a 6, 7 or 8 is sometimes difficult for me to determine.  In addition, I frequently change my rating of a movie after seeing it several times.  <strong><em>However, </em></strong>in order for it to remain meaningful to <em>me</em>, a 10 must be reserved for the very best of the best.</p>
<p>In 1976, Nadia Comaneci (Co-men-eech) was the first Olympic gymnast to be awarded a perfect 10.  In fact she received several 10s that summer.  Subsequently, it was not so uncommon for a gymnast to receive a 10.  The &#8220;10&#8243; became less meaningful and a few years ago the scoring system was changed so there is no longer an upper limit; no longer a perfect score.  Well that&#8217;s just as bad as giving them out like they were &#8220;candy in your pocket.&#8221; [A partial quote from the Postman (1997), not intended to denigrate one of my favorite movies.  It just popped into my mind]</p>
<p>There can&#8217;t be an upper limit on the high jump, but there must be an upper limit when rating or scoring something.  One cannot get better than 100% on a test.  If the &#8220;perfect&#8221; score becomes too common, change the standards or make the test more difficult.</p>
<p>I understand why most reviewers give their highest rating to many movies.  I suppose for their purposes it&#8217;s necessary.  I just tend to over-analyze things (duh!).  They should continue to do what they do and I&#8217;ll keep doing it my way.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve already spent a few hours writing this post, I&#8217;ll leave it where it is.  Just spread the word that there&#8217;s a lunatic out there who believes a perfect score regarding movie ratings is nearly impossible to attain; therefore, it rarely should be given.</p>
<p>BTW, on the uncommon occasion that I have the energy to write a movie review longer than 140 characters I&#8217;ll write it here and link you to it.</p>
<p>I welcome your comments.</p>
<p>Anon E. Muss</p>
<p>** Footnote added 1/4/2011:  A film that deserves a 9 will be denoted as 9/10 to avoid being misconstrued as perfect.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/movieanarchist.wordpress.com/1/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/movieanarchist.wordpress.com/1/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=movieanarchist.com&#038;blog=18772183&#038;post=1&#038;subd=movieanarchist&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movieanarchist.com/2011/01/01/my-rating-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/732cca072c0dfeb775e3942b25f50b4c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">RAF</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
